The Rise and the Demise of Management

Sunday, 21 November 2010 21:28 Ayman Abouseif
Print PDF

In the relatively simple world of the eighteenth century individuals contracted directly and separately with each other to perform services or to deliver goods. That was sufficient to ensure economic progress then. Decades later, the industrial revolution rendered that model useless and a new means of organizing people and allocating resources for more complicated tasks was needed. This lead to the creation of the managed corporation which has served its purpose in the 20th century, it organized work, created jobs and contributed to the birth of the middle class. Business guru Peter Drucker considered management "the most important innovation of the 20th century."
An inevitable side effect of management is bureaucracy. Towards the end of the 20th century it became obvious to many enlightened business leaders and gurus that bureaucracy is the corporation’s biggest enemy. We have all read stories about how successful leaders fought bureaucracy in a desperate effort to make the elephant dance again, so in a sense the enlightened elite have become enemies of the established corporate norms, they broke the hierarchies, encourages informal communications and created cross functional teams. But as we all know bureaucracies are by definition resistant to change.

Today, even the best-managed enterprises aren't protected from the intensifying competition, rapid globalization and innovations by young students who have the potential to change the competitive horizons. Managed corporations are finding it increasingly difficult to deal with the accelerating rate of change. Many corporations responded by intensifying their matrix structures thinking that this will enable management to have multiple points view and healthy competition for resources while balancing the various interests of the corporation. This in fact has created top heavy management structures and left the employee to deal with multiple competing managers in a highly political atmosphere that slowed decision making and subsequently the corporation’s ability to respond to market forces.

In the last decade of the 20th century the internet enabled human beings on different continents and with vastly different skills and interests to work collaboratively together and coordinate complex tasks. The creation of the Linux operating system and Wikipedia are two examples of extremely complex work that now can be accomplished with little or no corporate management structure at all. That's led some thinkers to coin the term "mass collaboration" as the new form of economic organization. Some believe that corporate hierarchies will disappear, as individuals are empowered to work together in creating "a new era, perhaps even a golden one.
Clearly our traditional managed corporation will need to morph into something different, no one can really tell how that will look like but w know it will need to be flexible, agile, able to quickly adjust to market forces, and laser sharp in reallocating resources to new opportunities. Additionally the new model will have to be able to motivate and inspire workers, instill drive and innovation, something traditional management has evidently failed to achieve.

The past few decades have seen a vast amount of research in the area of leadership (as opposed to management); researchers developed many leadership theories and analyzed the behavior of successful leaders. Corporations enrolled their managers into leadership classes, retained leadership coaches and changed the job titles of many management positions. Yet the absolute majority of those of occupy the management hierarchy can’t be described as leaders.

Can the 20th-century corporation evolve into this new, 21st-century organization, or will we see the demise of many traditional corporations along with their traditional managers? While it is hard to imagine building the Bay Bridge as a collaborative effort over the internet, one can safely assume that traditional management with its love for bureaucracy and hate for change will have a less prominent place in the 21st century modern organization, but the question is whether today’s business schools are capable of developing and delivering true leadership.

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit!! Mixx! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! LinkedIn! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Saturday, 07 May 2011 11:59


0 #4 Sayed Al Hamamsi 2010-12-05 19:52
New style of leadership replacing management, yes. Companies behaving more like a network of professionals rather than a hierarchy, yes. But loosely coupled bunch of people working across the web to deliver products and services in the3 way described in the article .. I don't see it.
0 #3 Mourad Fahmy 2010-11-27 01:14
Why do I get the feeling that we in the Arab World are 'protected' or rather isolated from such advancements in management.

Joking aside, I tend to agree that the missing component from today's enterprise is leadership ..
0 #2 D Jones 2010-11-22 06:36
The views expressed in the article are somewhat Utopian .. a business that is established to make money for its shareholders will never let go of control and turn into a society. We know that bureaucracy and policies are created to guard against the bad few and I don't know whether an organization will be able to find itself running in a bureaucracy free environment any time in the new future. It is simply a necessary evil.
0 #1 H Al Ajmi 2010-11-22 06:20
I think the new corporation will not be like Wikipedia but will also not be like the old style managed business.
It will be somewhere in between, it will have more leaders and less managers, it will have a more fluid structure, it will be project based and it will rely on virtual time bound teams.

Add comment

By commenting on our blog, you are automatically confirming that you have read and agreed to abide by our editorial policy found under About CIO2CIO - CIO2CIO Editorial Policy

Security code

Anti-spam: complete the task
  • Poll
  • Login
  • Search

Does your organization use big data?

Follow CIO2CIO on: